711.). He nevertheless challenges the amounts awarded upon the stated grounds (among others) that, each of the recipients being a publicly-financed legal services organization, the awards should not be made at rates which reflect the value of services rendered by private attorneys; and that the amounts awarded were not based upon a correct cost accounting which was required in order to insure that none of the publicly-financed recipients would realize a profit., It is settled that attorneys' fees May be awarded to publicly-financed legal services organizations pursuant to section 10962, and that the amount thereof rests within the trial court's traditionally broad discretion in fixing such fees when they are properly awarded. TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. No. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. At that hearing, counsel for father may have waived the 30day time limit for hearing the petition.2 The next hearing was set for September 12, 1996. We here quote the factual recital in Hypolite v. Carleson, supra, 32 Cal.App.3d 979, 108 Cal.Rptr. Your email address will not be published. '11 (Emphasis added. 796, 484 P.2d 964), and the overriding question whether its maintenance as a class action will be advantageous to the judicial process and to the litigants. (Collins v. Rocha, supra, 7 Cal.3d 232 at p. 238, 102 Cal.Rptr. Unless otherwise noted, all further references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code. of Soc. 28-014 28.14. Writ of mandate (California Contact us. Appeals Bd. Chapter 3 of Title 1 deals with the writ of prohibition. 837626) challenging the Rent Board's December 4, 1984, decision with respect to the utility pass-through issue and seeking a further administrative hearing on the Rent Board's waiver of Rule 4.11 (b). Respondent court reminded counsel that he had been extremely ill for six weeks and hospitalized for part of that time. . The peremptory writ must be in a similar form, except that the words requiring the party to show cause why he or she has not done as commanded must be omitted. ( ) Although the statute appears to speak in the alternative, it uniformly has been held that two requirements must be met in order to sustain any class action: (1) there must be an ascertainable class (citations); and (2) there must be a well defined community of interest in the questions of law and fact involved affecting the parties to be represented (citations).' This says inter alia that when a period, prescribed by statute or rule of court, within which to exercise a right or perform a duty is commenced by the service of notice by mail, the period is extended five days if the address is within California. CA Court of Appeal Opinions and Cases | FindLaw <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 13 0 R 14 0 R 22 0 R 23 0 R 24 0 R 30 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> . The current judge in this case, alone, handles a daily calendar of 40 to 50 cases, including four or five trials designated as no time waiver cases because the minors are detained outside the home. ., 14. In that case the Supreme Court definitively established the principles which control the maintenance of a class action pursuant to section 382 of the Code of Civil Procedure, stating: That section provides in relevant part: .
Why Did Tori Campbell Leave Ktvu, Articles P